The mere mention of equality makes some people roll their eyes and utter the words, here we go again. The reaction is often given the word has lost its true meaning, as it is sometimes portrayed negatively in the media and within wider society. Though many may dislike the subject, it is typically not because they disagree once they understand the cause better. Many often do not look past the term rather than understand the reason for the call to action.

To go back to the term’s true meaning, let us start by looking at the textbook definition. Equality means the state of being equal, especially in status, rights or opportunities. Equality does not mean taking power from one group and giving it to another; it merely implies that everyone should be treated the same. For example, if 15 people attended an interview and the most experienced and qualified person got the job, that would be a fair process. Individuals hired purely because of who they know, due to the social-economic group they belong to or because of the colour of their skin, then that creates inequality.

Another example is the age of consent. In many countries, the age at which a person can legally consent to and have sex is the same for men and women, regardless of sexual orientation. However, in some countries, the age of consent is different for those consenting to heterosexual or homosexual relations. For example, in certain countries, the difference between the consents can be two or even four years. These differences create inequalities because it would be a fairer system if everyone had legal consent at the same age. So, equality is simply treating everyone the same, good or bad, especially regarding the laws, rules and protection within any given country.

Many countries and regimes still defending and enforcing these antiquated laws are typically old-fashioned monarchies, dictatorships, oligarchies or juntas. Though expected with some well-known regimes, it is surprising to learn the number of democratic countries where prejudice and discriminatory laws still exist. For democracies, officials and governments are typically elected and appointed by that country’s people. The government is meant to represent, protect and ensure the well-being of all those that live within that country. Some may still have large groups of individuals that follow a particular faith or religion. However, the main principle for most modern nations is that the state and religion are meant to be separate.

Appointed representatives of districts, states, and provinces are elected to represent the rights and well-being of all those that live in their constituency. The representative’s personal views, beliefs and even their agendas should be secondary to the will of the people that they represent. The moment a government singles out and targets groups, they no longer serve all within that country. Especially when quoting laws written centuries ago or even scriptures to validate a point does not justify persecution. It is giving those carrying out these often-abhorrent acts a way of denying any responsibility and accountability